PHOENIX — Of the $1.9 million spent this cycle by “outside groups” to affect Arizona elections, $565,000 – or about 30 percent – comes with no disclosure of the source of the money.
Such “dark money” groups report only expenditures intended to help elect or defeat particular candidates. They don’t report sources of income.
But another 45 percent of the “outside money,” which is spent by groups other than candidates themselves, cannot be traced to an original source.
Instead, corporations that would otherwise file expenditure reports earning the “dark money” label can fund – sometimes entirely – an “outside” political committee, which spends money on elections, then reports the income as a business contribution. A recent report by Brennan Center for Justice termed such spending as “gray money.”
SolarCity accounts for a large portion of corporate cash passed through political committees, to then be spent on elections. Save Our AZ Solar, an independent expenditure committee that spent $667,000 advocating for Arizona Corporation Commissioner Bob Burns through his Republican primary re-election bid, received funding only from the solar panel company.
Stand for Children IEC (independent expenditure committee) has spent about $70,000 advocating for particular outcomes in legislative races. The committee got about 60 percent of its income from Stand for Children, Inc., an Oregon-based nonprofit corporation, whose most recent tax filings show $3,000,000 in income, with almost no information about the source.
dc.embed.loadNote(‘//www.documentcloud.org/documents/3100441-Stand-for-Children-2015-990/annotations/317016.js’); View note
Stand for Children IEC also gets 20 percent of its money from Greater Phoenix Leadership, Inc., a 501(c)(6) nonprofit corporation whose most recent IRS filing lists $1.6 million in membership dues.
dc.embed.loadNote(‘//www.documentcloud.org/documents/3100440-Greater-Phoenix-Leadership-2014-990/annotations/317020.js’); View note Other groups’ spending can be traced to donors. Responsible Leaders for AZ, which spent about $150,000 on Arizona elections this cycle got all of it’s money from the Realtors of AZ PAC, which reports to state election officials the names of thousands of small-dollar donors.
Support AZCIR
AZCIR Newsletter
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- You must credit us: For bylines, use “Author Name, Arizona Center for Investigative Reporting.” At the top of the text of the story, include a line that reads: "This story was originally published by the Arizona Center for Investigative Reporting." You must link the words "Arizona Center for Investigative Reporting" to the original URL of the story. You must use our logo.
- All stories must run in their entirety unless otherwise noted or agreed upon after discussion with AZCIR.
- All republished content delivered online must have a link to AZCIR and include all of the links in our story.
- All material must be attributed and credited prominently, and where appropriate for the material type throughout.
- Photos, graphics and other visual elements are permitted for one-time-use only.
- You have permission to edit AZCIR material to reflect changes in time, location and editorial style only.
- You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate or otherwise represent yourself as the owner of our material. This means you cannot re-distribute our material separately, or place it behind a paywall. You cannot fundraise or sell advertising against our material.